Eurasian Journal of Soil Science

Volume 4, Issue 1, Jan 2015, Pages 6 - 14
DOI: 10.18393/ejss.23635
Stable URL: http://ejss.fess.org/10.18393/ejss.23635
Copyright © 2015 The authors and Federation of Eurasian Soil Science Societies



Monitoring the effect of conservation practices on the erosion rates in some small watersheds in Eastern Romania

X

Article first published online: 05 Nov 2014 | How to cite | Additional Information (Show All)

Author information | Publication information | Export Citiation (Plain Text | BibTeX | EndNote | RefMan)

CLASSICAL | APA | MLA | TURABIAN | IEEE | ISO 690

Abstract | References | Article (XML) | Article (HTML) | PDF | 1035 | 3708

Popa,N., Nistor,D., Hurjui,C., Filiche,E., Petrovici,G., 2015. Monitoring the effect of conservation practices on the erosion rates in some small watersheds in Eastern Romania. Eurasian J Soil Sci 4(1):6 - 14. DOI : 10.18393/ejss.23635
Popa,N.,Nistor,D.Hurjui,C.Filiche,E.,& Petrovici,G. Monitoring the effect of conservation practices on the erosion rates in some small watersheds in Eastern Romania Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, DOI : 10.18393/ejss.23635
Popa,N.,Nistor,D.Hurjui,C.Filiche,E., and ,Petrovici,G."Monitoring the effect of conservation practices on the erosion rates in some small watersheds in Eastern Romania" Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, DOI : 10.18393/ejss.23635
Popa,N.,Nistor,D.Hurjui,C.Filiche,E., and ,Petrovici,G. "Monitoring the effect of conservation practices on the erosion rates in some small watersheds in Eastern Romania" Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, DOI : 10.18393/ejss.23635
N,Popa.D,Nistor.C,Hurjui.E,Filiche.G,Petrovici "Monitoring the effect of conservation practices on the erosion rates in some small watersheds in Eastern Romania" Eurasian J. Soil Sci, vol., no., pp., DOI : 10.18393/ejss.23635
Popa,Nelu ;Nistor,Dumitru ;Hurjui,Cosmin ;Filiche,Eugen ;Petrovici,Gabriel Monitoring the effect of conservation practices on the erosion rates in some small watersheds in Eastern Romania. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science,. DOI : 10.18393/ejss.23635

How to cite

Popa, N., Nistor, D., Hurjui, C., Filiche, E., Petrovici, G., 2015. Monitoring the effect of conservation practices on the erosion rates in some small watersheds in Eastern Romania. Eurasian J. Soil Sci. 4(1): 6 - 14. DOI : 10.18393/ejss.23635

Author information

Nelu Popa , Research and Development Center for Soil Erosion Control Perieni, Vaslui county, Romania
Dumitru Nistor , Research and Development Center for Soil Erosion Control Perieni, Vaslui county, Romania
Cosmin Hurjui , Research and Development Center for Soil Erosion Control Perieni, Vaslui county, Romania
Eugen Filiche , Research and Development Center for Soil Erosion Control Perieni, Vaslui county, Romania
Gabriel Petrovici , Research and Development Center for Soil Erosion Control Perieni, Vaslui county, Romania

Publication information

Issue published online: 01 Jan 2015
Article first published online : 05 Nov 2014
Manuscript Accepted : 21 Oct 2014
Manuscript Received: 15 Jul 2014
DOI: 10.18393/ejss.23635
Stable URL: http://ejss.fesss.org/10.18393/ejss.23635

Abstract

It is known that the successful implementation of control measures to preserve soil quality on slope agricultural lands depends largely on the designer’s ability to select a control strategy for a specific site, considerable simpler and less costly. The paper refers to several small watersheds with agricultural use, representative for Eastern hilly area ofRomania, where different types of soil conservation measures have been applied. The study included monitoring of some factors to highlight the role of soil conservation practices in reducing water erosion process. In this respect, it was studied the dynamics of the climatic, pedological, relief, vegetation, hydrology and erosion parameters. Runoff and erosion rates for individual storms were studied both at the plot and microbazin level by performing measurements on standard runoff plots, respectively in the network flow sections. Also, RUSLE model and Geographic Information System were used to simulate spatial distribution of erosion and sedimentation processes. Significant interactions and feedbacks were found to occur between soil characteristics and vegetation, which influenced both runoff and erosion responses. Monitoring allowed more direct linkages to be made between management practices and their impacts on runoff and soil erosion.

Keywords

Soil erosion, runoff plots, conservation practices

Corresponding author

References

Brakensiek, D.L., Osborn, H.B., Rawls, W.R., 1979. Field Manual for Research in Agricultural Hydrology, Agricultural Handbook 224, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

Foster, G.R., McCool, D.K., Renard, K.G., Moldenhauer. W.C., 1981 - Conversion of the universal soil loss equation to SI metric units. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 36(6): 355-359.

Hudson N.W., 1993. Field measurement of soil erosion and runoff. Edited by Silsoe Asociates Ampthill, Bedfort, United Kingdom.

Renard, K.G., Foster, G.R., Weesies, G.A., McCool, D.K., Yoder, D.C., 1997, Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning With the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), Agricultural Handbook, 703. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 404 pp.

Toit .J., Foster, G.R., Renard, K.G., 2002. Soil erosion: prediction, measurement, and control. Edited by J.Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York, USA.

Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D., 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses - A Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA, Washington DC.

Abstract
It is known that the successful implementation of control measures to preserve soil quality on slope agricultural lands depends largely on the designer’s ability to select a control strategy for a specific site, considerable simpler and less costly. The paper refers to several small watersheds with agricultural use, representative for Eastern hilly area ofRomania, where different types of soil conservation measures have been applied. The study included monitoring of some factors to highlight the role of soil conservation practices in reducing water erosion process. In this respect, it was studied the dynamics of the climatic, pedological, relief, vegetation, hydrology and erosion parameters. Runoff and erosion rates for individual storms were studied both at the plot and microbazin level by performing measurements on standard runoff plots, respectively in the network flow sections. Also, RUSLE model and Geographic Information System were used to simulate spatial distribution of erosion and sedimentation processes. Significant interactions and feedbacks were found to occur between soil characteristics and vegetation, which influenced both runoff and erosion responses. Monitoring allowed more direct linkages to be made between management practices and their impacts on runoff and soil erosion.

Keywords: Soil erosion, runoff plots, conservation practices

References

Brakensiek, D.L., Osborn, H.B., Rawls, W.R., 1979. Field Manual for Research in Agricultural Hydrology, Agricultural Handbook 224, U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

Foster, G.R., McCool, D.K., Renard, K.G., Moldenhauer. W.C., 1981 - Conversion of the universal soil loss equation to SI metric units. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 36(6): 355-359.

Hudson N.W., 1993. Field measurement of soil erosion and runoff. Edited by Silsoe Asociates Ampthill, Bedfort, United Kingdom.

Renard, K.G., Foster, G.R., Weesies, G.A., McCool, D.K., Yoder, D.C., 1997, Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning With the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), Agricultural Handbook, 703. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 404 pp.

Toit .J., Foster, G.R., Renard, K.G., 2002. Soil erosion: prediction, measurement, and control. Edited by J.Wiley&Sons, Inc., New York, USA.

Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D., 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses - A Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA, Washington DC.



Eurasian Journal of Soil Science