Abstract

Psamment is a coarse-textured soil with low water and nutrient retention capacity, which limits its agricultural productivity. This study investigated the effects of a biochar–compost–clay amendment on the physical properties of Psamment and evaluated maize (Zea mays L.) growth as an indicator response in a short-term pot experiment. In contrast to most studies on sandy soils that evaluate biochar, compost, or clay individually, this work examines their combined short-term application within a single amendment system. Pot experiments were conducted using five amendment rates 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 t ha⁻¹, equivalent to 0, 67, 135, 202, and 270 g pot⁻¹, respectively.. Initial soil properties were analysed before treatment application, and soil physical properties were assessed at the end of the growing period to capture treatment effects after one cropping cycle. The results showed that higher amendment rates induced statistically significant changes in selected soil physical properties. Bulk density decreased significantly, whereas total porosity increased significantly at the 30 and 40 t ha⁻¹ rates. Other physical parameters, including pore size distribution, available water, water retention, and soil aggregation showed numerical changes but were not statistically significant. Plant responses varied, and most growth and yield parameters did not differ significantly among treatments, with the highest biomass occurring in the 40 t ha⁻¹ treatment. These findings suggest that the combined application of biochar, compost, and clay initiates measurable short-term changes in selected physical properties of Psamment, while agronomic benefits may require longer-term soil–plant interactions.

Keywords: Combined biochar, maize growth, physical properties, psamment, yield.

References

Adrinal, Gusmini, Putri, E.L., Delind, N.M.F., 2024. Application of clay and rice husk biochar and its effect on soil pore distribution of Psamment and corn yield. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1306(1): 012025.

Agegnehu, G., Bass, A.M., Nelson, P.N., Bird, M.I., 2016. Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar–compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. Science of the Total Environment 543: 295–306.

Assouline, S., Or, D., 2013. Conceptual and parametric representation of soil hydraulic properties: A review. Vadose Zone Journal 12(4): 1-20.

Birol, M., Günal, H., 2024. Response of β-glucosidase enzyme activity of soil to biochar applications in a crop rotation at Blacksea agroecosystem. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 13(4): 294–302.

Blake, G.R., Hartge, K.H., 1986. Bulk density. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed. Klute, A. (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 363–375.

Blanco-Canqui, H., 2017. Biochar and soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 81(4): 687–711.

Brady, N.C., Weil, R.R., 2017. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 15th ed. Pearson, New York.

Bremner, J.M., Mulvaney, C.S., 1982. Nitrogen-Total. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., Keeney, D.R., (Eds.). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 595-624.

Bruun, E.W., Petersen, C.T., Hansen, E., Holm, J.K., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., 2014. Biochar amendment to coarse sandy subsoil improves root growth and increases water retention. Soil Use and Management 30(1): 109–118.

Busscher, W.J., Novak, J.M., Evans, D.E., Watts, D.W., Niandou, M.A.S., Ahmedna, M., 2010. Influence of pecan biochar on physical properties of a Norfolk loamy sand. Soil Science 175(1): 10–14.

Chen, C., Wang, R., Shang, J., Liu, K., Irshad, M.K., Hu, K., Arthur, E., 2018. Effect of biochar application on hydraulic properties of sandy soil under dry and wet conditions. Vadose Zone Journal 17(1): 1–8.

Ciampitti, I.A., Vyn, T.J., 2013. Grain nitrogen source changes over time in maize: A review. Crop Science 53(1): 366–377.

Danielson, R.E., Sutherland, P.L., 1986. Porosity. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed. Klute, A. (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 443–461.

Edeh, I.G., Mašek, O., Buss, W., 2020. A meta-analysis on biochar’s effects on soil water properties – New insights and future research challenges. Science of the Total Environment 714: 136857.

Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., Basra, S.M.A., 2009. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29: 185–212.

Gee, G.W., Bauder, J.W., 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed. Klute, A. (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 383–411.

Günal, H., Bayram, Ö., Günal, E., Erdem, H., 2019. Characterization of soil amendment potential of 18 different biochar types produced by slow pyrolysis. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 8(4): 329–339.

Hardie, M., Clothier, B., Bound, S., Oliver, G., Close, D., 2014. Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant and Soil 376: 347–361.

Hillel, D., 1998. Environmental soil physics. Academic Press, San Diego, USA. 771p.

ISRIC, 2002. Procedures for Soil Analysis. In: Technical Paper, 6th ed.  van Reeuwijk, L.P. (Ed.), International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 14-3–14-4.

Jeffery, S., Abalos, D., Spokas, K., Verheijen, F., 2017. Biochar effects on crop yield. In: Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation. Lehmann, J., Joseph, S. (Eds.), 2nd Edition. Routledge, London, pp. 301–326.

Klute, A., Dirksen, C., 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed. Klute, A. (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 687–734.

Lehmann, J., Joseph, S., 2015. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation. 2nd edition. Routledge, London. 976p.

Long, V.V., Dung, T.V., 2023. Reducing nitrogen fertilizer combined with biochar amendment improves soil quality and increases grain yield in the intensive rice cultivation system. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 12(3): 222–228.

Mukherjee, A., Lal, R., Zimmerman, A.R., 2014. Impacts of biochar and other amendments on soil-carbon and nitrogen stability: A laboratory column study. Soil Science Society of America Journal 78: 1258–1266.

Obia, A., Mulder, J., Martinsen, V., Cornelissen, G., Børresen, T., 2016. In situ effects of biochar on aggregation, water retention and porosity in light-textured tropical soils. Soil and Tillage Research 155: 35–44.

Oesman, R., 2017. Efficiency of inorganic fertilizer use due to organic fertilizer application on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in Ultisol soil. Jurnal Pertanian Tropik 4(2): 122–129.

Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S., Dean, L.A., 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U. S. Department of Agriculture Circular No. 939. Washington, DC, USA.

Oyeyiola, Y.B., Tanga, M., Lewu, F.B., 2025. Single biochar application enhanced the effectiveness of organic fertilizers in a continuously cropped soil. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 14(4): 325–335.

Rawls, W.J., Pachepsky, Y.A., Ritchie, J.C., Sobecki, T.M., Bloodworth, H., 2003. Effect of soil organic carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma 116(1–2): 61–76.

Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., Denef, K., 2004. A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research 79: 7–31.

Sumner, M.E., Miller, W.P., 1996. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. pp. 1201–1229.

Tapiani, W., 2020. The effect of rice husk biochar, clay soil, and rice straw mulch addition in minimum tillage on changes in soil physical properties and the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) on Psamment. Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Andalas, Padang.

USDA, 2022. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey Staff, USA. 372p. Available at [Access date: 10.12.2025]: https://nrcs.app.box.com/s/xi57bj6zyo601eokr7v715mkdpeaa81h/file/1147478400323

Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29–38.

Wong, J.T.F., Chow, K.L., Chen, X.W., Ng, C.W.W., Wong, M.H., 2022. Effects of biochar on soil water retention curves of compacted clay during wetting and drying. Biochar 4: 4.